Devon Council votes down controversial bylaw

DEVON -- A bylaw that would have allowed secondary suites within low-density residential areas in Devon has been defeated prior to its second reading.

The bylaw was the subject of a public hearing on Apr. 27, which saw community members fill the Devon Council chambers to voice their feedback and concerns. While some spoke in favour of Bylaw 1028-2026, many others voiced concerns with the stipulation that would have removed spacing requirements to better implement secondary suites in the R2 District.

In their report, Devon administration had stated that their rationale for the proposed bylaw related to the need to diversify and increase housing options throughout the township. They added that secondary suites contribute to achieving these goals by providing small-scale, attainable housing options within existing residential neighbourhoods, without altering established neighbourhood character.

However, some residents speaking at the public hearing expressed concerns about increased issues around parking in residential neighbourhoods, while others spoke against the notion of densification of the local community.

"We're on the right track, we're clearly seeing a greater value, and Devon is an awesome place to live," said one resident. "Let's not stray into the false promises and perils of densification."

The resident argued that densification in other jurisdictions, such as the City of Edmonton, have not had the intended results, and that increasing housing density typically does not result in net benefits for the community. 

"No one has applied for secondary suites in two years since they changed the bylaw," said another resident. "So, why would we want to change it from every four houses to every house in town in the R2? That's the question I have."

Those speaking in support of the bylaw noted that many younger residents are unable to find suitable housing and are often forced to move away from the community, while others said it would be of benefit to have secondary suites available for aging family members.

"There are a lot of reasons why I don't approve of this," said Councillor Mike Hanly. "Mostly, it's the peace meal, the predictability -- this is not a planned, and positive growth pattern that I see being developed." 

Following debate, the motion to give Bylaw 1028-2026 second reading narrowly failed by a vote of 4-3.